Tue 11 Mar 2008
Have Autosport lost their minds?
Posted by Craig under Formula 1 with the tags Autosport • Ayrton Senna • China GP • f1 • F1:2008 • Fernando Alonso • Formula 1 • Japan GP • Jenson Button • Lewis Hamilton • McLaren • Michael Schumacher • Rubens Barrichello • wet weatherI think I’m destined to fund fault with every F1 magazine I ever read! I’m not really the type to complain too much, although reading this blog you would be forgiven to think the opposite!
As the new season gets underway this weekend, I decided to splash out on Autosport so I could soak up the info in their F1 Season Preview magazine. So with all good intentions I have been making my way through it and my break away from reading such magazines meant I was actually learning things and being reminded of things I had forgotten.
The reduction in electronic driver aids this year means that there are some variables which haven’t had to be pondered prior to the last few seasons starting, so it was interesting to read about those.
Then things took a turn for the worse. These aids helped with the driver finding enough traction to lay down the power in order to go around, and get away from, corners as quickly as possible. This year without this help it’s obviously going to be much more difficult, even more so in the wet, and so Autosport had a nice piece explaining what could be affected and how a driver will have to compensate in the wet.
That was all fine and dandy, until they decided to list their all-time top ten wet weather drivers. Unsurprisingly Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher were the top two, with the rest of the field made up mainly of men from yesteryear who really did have to drive with no help from their cars whatsoever. The exception was Damon Hill who featured further down the order and also, surprise surprise, Lewis Hamilton who sneaked in at 9th on the list.
How can he possibly be considered in the top ten wet weather drivers of all-time at this stage in his career?
Yes he drove reasonably well in the wet races last year, but his driving came under scrutiny after the Japanese GP where he was accused of causing an accident under the safety car (which he was found to be not guilty of after investigation) and he effectively threw away his best chance of winning the World Championship in another wet race the very next week.
The introduction to the top ten list claimed that people such as Fernando Alonso, Rubens Barichello and Jenson Button didn’t feature because although they were all good in the wet this list was only to include those drivers which were the best of their respective eras - which is another reason why Hamilton should not be there.
Not yet anyway - it’s simply too early to tell, He may go on to be the best wet weather driver ever, or he may be absolutely rubbish. Autosport would do well to have explained that in their introduction and left Lewis off the list for now too.
March 11th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
things like this will not surprise me anymore … I still remember the first issue of F1Racing magazine after Kimi has won the title, and who was on cover page ? Mr. Hamilton… The journalists are not doing Hamilton any favours with a coverage like this.
March 11th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
I hate to say it, but this is another reason why I don’t read Autosport, either on paper or online. Considering Hamilton an all-time top-ten wet weather driver is simply ludicrous. As you say, his driving behaviour was called in to question after the rain-soaked Japan race, and he binned it in the moderately wet Chinese event.
I have to ask, but I think I’m going to be disappointed: Did Jean Alesi feature anywhere on this list?
March 11th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Very true Ollie. And don’t forget his less than impressive European GP either, which he only completed with the help of a crane!
March 11th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
Milos »
Good point Milos, the media probably think they are doing Lewis (and themselves) a favour by promoting him so much, but it will all backfire eventually (if it hasn’t already).
I was thinking about F1 Racing as well - perhaps the then Editor, Mr Bishop, was in the process of applying for his new McLaren job when that issue came out…
March 11th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Ollie » Prepare to be disappointed!
All the other drivers featured had all completed their careers - Hill, Schumacher and Senna were the only reletively recent people mentioned so why the need to include Lewis I’ll never know. Alesi would have been a much better candidate - one who showed his skills over many seasons, not just one in which wet races were rare and even in those Hamilton didn’t outshine everyone!
I think there may be plans afoot in the media to include him in every Top Ten list they produce.
doctorvee » I’d forgotten about the European GP - damn more ammunition to hit Autosport with!
March 11th, 2008 at 5:26 pm
[...] Have Autosport lost their minds? - craigblog.co.uk Apparently, Lewis Hamilton is the ninth best wet weather driver OF ALL TIME. *sigh* (tags: Autosport media LewisHamilton LewyLove msm rain weather) [...]
March 11th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
Somehow I expected more of Autosport. (Though it’s years since I’ve actually read the mag.)
I’ve always rated Hill as a wet weather driver.
But Hamilton? He wouldn’t even be in my top ten wet weather drivers of last year.
March 12th, 2008 at 12:05 am
I am presuming that Alesi wasn’t mentioned since you haven’t denied the charge, Craig. But was Keke? Or Hans Stuck (jnr)?
That’s the trouble with all these lists of the top ten greatest whatevers - they’re bound to omit some that we think should have been included. I’d go further than you, however, and say that Lewis will never be regarded as great in the wet - competent maybe, great never. The rainmeisters show their talent the moment it rains and it seems to be a skill that can’t be learned. I think Hamilton has blown his chance on that one already.
Keke Rosberg won the 1978 International Trophy at Silverstone in a downpour. It was only his second race in F1 and he was driving a Theodore (approximately equivalent to a 2007 Spyker but not so well funded). Conditions were similar to last year’s at Fuji - and Keke made the great names look silly as he disappeared into the distance. I wish I could find a video of the race for you to see for it is a perfect demonstration of the fact that you’ve either got it or you haven’t.
March 12th, 2008 at 9:42 am
I always think you’re on dodgy ground including an active driver in a list of ‘all time’ greats. Especially someone like Hamilton, whose career has barely even begun.
March 12th, 2008 at 10:26 am
Clive »
No mention of any of those unfortunately Clive, you can see the full list and their “evidence” in support here. I must admit, most of those included are from before my time so I can’t comment on them - the inclusion of Hill, Schumacher and Senna are okay by me, Hamilton is my main gripe.
Keith »
That was my main argument, how can you know who is going to be the best driver of the current era when it is ongoing? Crazy!
May 8th, 2008 at 12:05 am
[...] would be forgiven to think the opposite! As the new season gets underway this weekend, I decided tohttp://www.craigblog.co.uk/2008/03/11/have-autosport-lost-their-minds/A return to Formula 1? Senna’s legend continues IANS via Yahoo! India News Barcelona, May 1 DPA You [...]