Tue 25 Mar 2008
F1:2008 - Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink
Posted by Craig under Formula 1 with the tags Adrian Newey • BMW • David Coulthard • drink • F1:2008. Formula 1 • Lewis Hamilton • McLaren • Red BullImagine someone asks you to draw a racing car, just gives you a blank piece of paper and a pencil - what would be the first thing you’d draw?
Me, I’d probably start at the nose and do a nice sweeping line back then a little dip to symbolise the cockpit (they have raised sides now, but I’m kinda old fashioned!), before rising up to the airbox and then sloping back down over the engine cover to the rear wing. That wing would be next before adding in the wheels and a line along the floor of the car.
An adventurous sort may try to add on little wings and flaps which of course real F1 cars feature but are hard to replicate from memory.
Only at this point have I thought about maybe adding a helmet in the cockpit to show that that’s where the driver would go - and it would seem the real-life F1 designers are much the same as us mere mortals.
A car of any description is of absolutely no use without someone to drive it - an F1 car even more so. What would be the point in spending millions of pounds designing and developing something that’s going to sit still without someone to pilot it?
Red Bull’s Adrian Newey has a reputation of being particularly inconsiderate when it comes to driver comfort, with his previous designs often ending up horrible places to be even for only a couple of hours during a grand prix. The space left for the driver is often too hot, too short and too narrow for him to be able to comfortably do his job to the best of his ability.
As the races head off into more and more exotic climates, surely the drivers should come into the equation a bit earlier in the design process. From a designers point of view, I would imagine they are too busy concentrating on the rulebook and how to exploit it to be bothered by other human beings and their complaints!
This has all come to our attention this weekend when Lewis Hamilton complained that his drinks bottle had failed so he was unable to take on fluid during probably the hottest race of the year. This attracted a lot of attention as it was broadcast live on ITV, and has been repeated on several websites.
The BMW drivers are apparently also reporting issues with their drinks bottles - it would seem that the water inside is becoming too hot to drink which means that having the system at all is a bit of a waste of time. It’s a strange complaint that I don’t think I’ve heard before from any other team - this has attracted a little bit of coverage, mainly on sidepodcast.
Finally, on his own blog David Coulthard has mentioned that his drinks bottle failed on the very first lap too - this has received no media coverage at all!
When Hamilton mentioned it on ITV, it was as if it was a rare occurence and perhaps in his F1 career it has indeed been a rare thing - but from reports coming out of other teams it would appear this is an all too common thing.
Surely the teams should be looking into this with a view that it can’t possibly be good for the drivers to endure such extremes of heat without any chance of rehydration?
March 26th, 2008 at 11:31 am
I’m glad you mentioned the other drivers who had drink problems in Malaysia - the British press’ hysteria over Hamilton’s supposed dehydration has obliterated the fact that quite a few drivers had similar difficulties.
And it seems odd that there should be a sudden spate of problems in this area over several teams. It’s not often different teams all have “communication problems with the pits”, for instance.
Could it be that so little attention is paid to drinks for the driver that the systems often fail and that it was only worth mentioning in Sepang because it was so hot? As far as I know, it’s a pretty primitive arrangement consisting of a bottle and a tube to the driver’s mouth.
Is there room for a designer to be given the brief of creating a failsafe system in each team? Perhaps all development on the cars should be halted until this little stickler is well and truly sorted. After all, it would be pretty silly to have the fastest car on the grid and then have the driver collapse two laps from the end of the race. Max should definitely appoint a committee to study this one in more detail.
Yes, I know - I really should get out more…
March 26th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Clive » I can imagine it’s not good medically speaking to go for a couple of hours in that heat without taking on fluid of some kind. I’m sure the drivers will be asking their teams to get it sorted out, but whether they listen is another matter!
Nice to see a familiar face back here, I’ve been under “Lewis-mania attack” the past couple of days!!
It’s the last time I mention Lewis Hamilton in a post title that’s for sure!
March 26th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
I visit at least once a day, Craig, although I may not always comment. And I prefer to stay away from the endless Hamilton debates - what is there left to say? We just have to wait and see how he gets on.
March 26th, 2008 at 2:17 pm
Clive » Endless is the operative word Clive!!
March 26th, 2008 at 4:47 pm
Some of us recall the British Grand Prix of 1986, when Nigel Mansell’s drinks bottle failed (he had taken the spare car, following a first corner shunt and subsequent restart). He won the race in magnificent fashion of course, with typical lashings of Mansell drama, and had to be supported on the rostrum. Although Nigel was one of the first F1 drivers to take physical fitness seriously in the 1980s, I think this demonstrates the incredible physical condition of the current generation of drivers, backed up as they are by physios, sports scientists, personal trainers, and so on. It also demonstrates that the humble drinks bottle has long been a neglected part of racing car design. It’s one of those things that never ceases to amaze me, along with the fact that a car as sophisticated as an F1 machine needs an army of people to fire it into life (Peter Windsor has returned to this subject on a number of occasions in his F1 Racing columns).
March 26th, 2008 at 10:18 pm
George » I think with Nigel you were never sure if he was in genuine distress or if he was playing on it a bit!
It does seem crazy to me too that this is something which has seemingly gone on for so long without anyone appearing to learn from their past mistakes. If it resulted in a degradation of laptimes then they would have sorted it in a flash!
March 27th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Craig >> which was what we all loved about Nigel of course, a showman to the very end. On the BBC website last year, Kovalainen talks about the use of a water bottle - http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/6657663.stm - claiming that in Spain he didn’t use one, as it saved weight and a calculated four seconds over race distance. He then added that in Malaysia he would have lost more than four seconds by not having one, so it made sense to use one there. It is hard to believe that at the pinnacle of automotive technological achievement they can’t make a reliable drinks bottle…
March 27th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
George » It is hard to believe indeed.
I think they also struggle to get the radios to work half the time as well - I remember someone (DC perhaps?) saying he was getting calls for taxis at Silverstone through his helmet speakers one year!
Anything that’s not designed to make the car travelling round the circuit faster seems to just get overlooked.
March 27th, 2008 at 6:12 pm
[...] F1:2008 - Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink - craigblog.co.uk Several drivers complaining about being unable to drink their water [...]
March 28th, 2008 at 6:48 pm
It seems to me that every time the F1 circus visits Malaysia, some driver’s drinks bottle fails - though four seems pretty bizarre for a coincidence. Perhaps the vibrations are a problem, but it does seem odd that it hasn’t been solved yet. As for the radios, that’s a function of the radio bands F1 teams are permitted to use being so narrow and cramped in the spectrum. If the teams had free choice over how much bandwidth they used, they’d have much wider ones and put their radio frequencies further away from other people’s frequencies.